You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4 |
| Authors |
Sander L. van der Linden, Anthony A. Leiserowitz, Geoffrey D. Feinberg, Edward W. Maibach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 12% |
| Australia | 9 | 10% |
| Norway | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 79% |
| Scientists | 9 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 297 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 65 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 64 | 20% |
| Psychology | 36 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 19% |
| Unknown | 55 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#187,403
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#85
of 6,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,412
of 243,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#3
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.