You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of different restorative materials on secondary caries development in situ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Dental Medicine, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Françoise H. van de Sande, Niek J.M. Opdam, Gert Jan Truin, Ewald M. Bronkhorst, Johannes J. de Soet, Maximiliano S. Cenci, Marie-Charlotte Huysmans |
| Abstract |
The effect of direct restorative materials on caries lesion formation was investigated with an 8-week in situ study with split-mouth design, testing the hypothesis that no difference in mineral loss next to a restoration would be found between different composite-based-materials and amalgam. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dental Medicine
#488
of 1,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,294
of 240,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dental Medicine
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.