You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommended Patient-Reported Core Set of Symptoms to Measure in Adult Cancer Treatment Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/dju129 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bryce B Reeve, Sandra A Mitchell, Amylou C Dueck, Ethan Basch, David Cella, Carolyn Miller Reilly, Lori M Minasian, Andrea M Denicoff, Ann M O'Mara, Michael J Fisch, Cynthia Chauhan, Neil K Aaronson, Corneel Coens, Deborah Watkins Bruner |
| Abstract |
The National Cancer Institute's Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee held a clinical trials planning meeting (September 2011) to identify a core symptom set to be assessed across oncology trials for the purposes of better understanding treatment efficacy and toxicity and to facilitate cross-study comparisons. We report the results of an evidence-synthesis and consensus-building effort that culminated in recommendations for core symptoms to be measured in adult cancer clinical trials that include a patient-reported outcome (PRO). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 47% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 15% |
| Psychology | 29 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,426,793
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#2,139
of 7,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,368
of 241,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#32
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.