You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards more equal footing in north–south biodiversity research: European and sub-Saharan viewpoints
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0761-z |
| Authors |
Jan Christian Habel, Hilde Eggermont, Sven Günter, Ronald K. Mulwa, Marco Rieckmann, Lian Pin Koh, Saliou Niassy, J. Willem H. Ferguson, Gelaye Gebremichael, Mwangi Githiru, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Luc Lens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Botswana | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,938,988
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,791
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,482
of 233,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.