↓ Skip to main content

The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
174 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
831 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1568 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders
Published in
Psychological Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1017/s003329171400172x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. J. Baxter, T. S. Brugha, H. E. Erskine, R. W. Scheurer, T. Vos, J. G. Scott

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are persistent disabling neurodevelopmental disorders clinically evident from early childhood. For the first time, the burden of ASDs has been estimated for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010). The aims of this study were to develop global and regional prevalence models and estimate the global burden of disease of ASDs. Method A systematic review was conducted for epidemiological data (prevalence, incidence, remission and mortality risk) of autistic disorder and other ASDs. Data were pooled using a Bayesian meta-regression approach while adjusting for between-study variance to derive prevalence models. Burden was calculated in terms of years lived with disability (YLDs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), which are reported here by world region for 1990 and 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,568 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1548 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 252 16%
Student > Bachelor 216 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 181 12%
Researcher 137 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 89 6%
Other 247 16%
Unknown 446 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 266 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 252 16%
Neuroscience 116 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 5%
Other 284 18%
Unknown 503 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#155,393
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#67
of 5,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,207
of 241,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.