↓ Skip to main content

Barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use in obstetric practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use in obstetric practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Ollerhead, David Osrin

Abstract

The partograph is a graphic display of the progress of labour, recommended by the World Health Organization, but often underused in practice in low- and middle-income countries. We were interested in going beyond demonstration of potential efficacy - on which the existing literature concentrates - through a systematic review to identify barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mali 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 218 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 24%
Student > Postgraduate 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 20%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 54 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,829,843
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,507
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,126
of 210,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#43
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.