↓ Skip to main content

DLK1-DIO3 imprinted cluster in induced pluripotency: landscape in the mist

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DLK1-DIO3 imprinted cluster in induced pluripotency: landscape in the mist
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00018-014-1698-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonidas Benetatos, George Vartholomatos, Eleftheria Hatzimichael

Abstract

DLK1-DIO3 represents an imprinted cluster which genes are involved in physiological cell biology as early as the stem cell level and in the pathogenesis of several diseases. Transcription factor-mediated induced pluripotent cells (iPSCs) are considered an unlimited source of patient-specific hematopoietic stem cells for clinical application in patient-tailored regenerative medicine. However, to date there is no marker established able to distinguish embryonic stem cell-equivalent iPSCs or safe human iPSCs. Recent findings suggest that the DLK1-DIO3 locus possesses the potential to represent such a marker but there are also contradictory data. This review aims to report the current data on the topic describing both sides of the coin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,434,573
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#567
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,749
of 231,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.