You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Pharmacist Care in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.399 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Valérie Santschi, Arnaud Chiolero, Bernard Burnand, April L. Colosimo, Gilles Paradis |
Abstract |
Pharmacists may improve the clinical management of major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. A systematic review was conducted to determine the impact of pharmacist care on the management of CVD risk factors among outpatients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 33% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 141 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Librarian | 9 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 48 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 33% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 51 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,240,723
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#3,483
of 11,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,350
of 136,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#17
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.