↓ Skip to main content

Insect sodium channels and insecticide resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Invertebrate Neuroscience, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insect sodium channels and insecticide resistance
Published in
Invertebrate Neuroscience, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10158-006-0036-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ke Dong

Abstract

Voltage-gated sodium channels are essential for the generation and propagation of action potentials (i.e., electrical impulses) in excitable cells. Although most of our knowledge about sodium channels is derived from decades of studies of mammalian isoforms, research on insect sodium channels is revealing both common and unique aspects of sodium channel biology. In particular, our understanding of the molecular dynamics and pharmacology of insect sodium channels has advanced greatly in recent years, thanks to successful functional expression of insect sodium channels in Xenopus oocytes and intensive efforts to elucidate the molecular basis of insect resistance to insecticides that target sodium channels. In this review, I discuss recent literature on insect sodium channels with emphases on the prominent role of alternative splicing and RNA editing in the generation of functionally diverse sodium channels in insects and the current understanding of the interactions between insect sodium channels and insecticides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 263 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 19%
Researcher 47 17%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 44 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Environmental Science 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,112,846
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Invertebrate Neuroscience
#5
of 90 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,299
of 157,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Invertebrate Neuroscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them