↓ Skip to main content

Internally generated sequences in learning and executing goal-directed behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
464 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internally generated sequences in learning and executing goal-directed behavior
Published in
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Pezzulo, Matthijs A.A. van der Meer, Carien S. Lansink, Cyriel M.A. Pennartz

Abstract

A network of brain structures including hippocampus (HC), prefrontal cortex, and striatum controls goal-directed behavior and decision making. However, the neural mechanisms underlying these functions are unknown. Here, we review the role of 'internally generated sequences': structured, multi-neuron firing patterns in the network that are not confined to signaling the current state or location of an agent, but are generated on the basis of internal brain dynamics. Neurophysiological studies suggest that such sequences fulfill functions in memory consolidation, augmentation of representations, internal simulation, and recombination of acquired information. Using computational modeling, we propose that internally generated sequences may be productively considered a component of goal-directed decision systems, implementing a sampling-based inference engine that optimizes goal acquisition at multiple timescales of on-line choice, action control, and learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
France 5 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 436 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 26%
Researcher 96 21%
Student > Master 53 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Professor 27 6%
Other 73 16%
Unknown 55 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 112 24%
Psychology 92 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 20%
Computer Science 27 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Other 44 9%
Unknown 85 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,927,052
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#1,023
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,526
of 247,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.