You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3819-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ugo Boggi, Simona Palladino, Gabriele Massimetti, Fabio Vistoli, Fabio Caniglia, Nelide De Lio, Vittorio Perrone, Linda Barbarello, Mario Belluomini, Stefano Signori, Gabriella Amorese, Franco Mosca |
| Abstract |
The enhanced dexterity offered by robotic assistance could be excessive for distal pancreatectomy but not enough to improve the outcome of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Total pancreatectomy retains the challenges of uncinate process dissection and digestive reconstruction, but avoids the risk of pancreatic fistula, and could be a suitable operation to highlight the advantages of robotic assistance in pancreatic resections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 17% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 60% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,702,068
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,362
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,551
of 236,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#112
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.