You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explanations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Synthese, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-010-9847-7 |
| Authors |
Iris van Rooij, Cory D. Wright, Todd Wareham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 11 | 26% |
| Psychology | 8 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,399,427
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#535
of 2,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,803
of 111,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.