↓ Skip to main content

Prehospital Ticagrelor in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
85 X users
patent
1 patent
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prehospital Ticagrelor in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1407024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilles Montalescot, Arnoud W van 't Hof, Frédéric Lapostolle, Johanne Silvain, Jens Flensted Lassen, Leonardo Bolognese, Warren J Cantor, Angel Cequier, Mohamed Chettibi, Shaun G Goodman, Christopher J Hammett, Kurt Huber, Magnus Janzon, Béla Merkely, Robert F Storey, Uwe Zeymer, Olivier Stibbe, Patrick Ecollan, Wim M J M Heutz, Eva Swahn, Jean-Philippe Collet, Frank F Willems, Caroline Baradat, Muriel Licour, Anne Tsatsaris, Eric Vicaut, Christian W Hamm

Abstract

Background The direct-acting platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor can reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events when administered at hospital admission to patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether prehospital administration of ticagrelor can improve coronary reperfusion and the clinical outcome is unknown. Methods We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study involving 1862 patients with ongoing STEMI of less than 6 hours' duration, comparing prehospital (in the ambulance) versus in-hospital (in the catheterization laboratory) treatment with ticagrelor. The coprimary end points were the proportion of patients who did not have a 70% or greater resolution of ST-segment elevation before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the proportion of patients who did not have Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 in the infarct-related artery at initial angiography. Secondary end points included the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and definite stent thrombosis at 30 days. Results The median time from randomization to angiography was 48 minutes, and the median time difference between the two treatment strategies was 31 minutes. The two coprimary end points did not differ significantly between the prehospital and in-hospital groups. The absence of ST-segment elevation resolution of 70% or greater after PCI (a secondary end point) was reported for 42.5% and 47.5% of the patients, respectively. The rates of major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between the two study groups. The rates of definite stent thrombosis were lower in the prehospital group than in the in-hospital group (0% vs. 0.8% in the first 24 hours; 0.2% vs. 1.2% at 30 days). Rates of major bleeding events were low and virtually identical in the two groups, regardless of the bleeding definition used. Conclusions Prehospital administration of ticagrelor in patients with acute STEMI appeared to be safe but did not improve pre-PCI coronary reperfusion. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ATLANTIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01347580 .).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 409 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 14%
Other 50 12%
Student > Master 42 10%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Other 108 26%
Unknown 90 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 249 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 <1%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 108 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#252,575
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,448
of 32,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,121
of 249,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#43
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.