You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ergativity and the complexity of extraction: a view from Mayan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11049-014-9260-x |
| Authors |
Lauren Eby Clemens, Jessica Coon, Pedro Mateo Pedro, Adam Milton Morgan, Maria Polinsky, Gabrielle Tandet, Matthew Wagers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 26% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 32 | 60% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,785,250
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#171
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,657
of 236,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.