↓ Skip to main content

TightRope versus clavicular hook plate fixation for unstable distal clavicular fractures

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TightRope versus clavicular hook plate fixation for unstable distal clavicular fractures
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00590-014-1526-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tapio Flinkkilä, Akseli Heikkilä, Kai Sirniö, Harri Pakarinen

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to compare the fracture union and functional results of clavicular hook plate fixation versus arthroscopy-assisted TightRope fixation of unstable fractures of the distal clavicle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,236,620
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#538
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,994
of 238,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.