You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychometric Properties of the Brief Health Literacy Screen in Clinical Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2568-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth A. Wallston, Courtney Cawthon, Candace D. McNaughton, Russell L. Rothman, Chandra Y. Osborn, Sunil Kripalani |
| Abstract |
The three-item Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS) has been validated in research settings, but not in routine practice, administered by clinical personnel. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 25% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,138,109
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,260
of 7,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,088
of 202,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#29
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.