↓ Skip to main content

Privacy in the Digital World: Medical and Health Data Outside of HIPAA Protections

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Privacy in the Digital World: Medical and Health Data Outside of HIPAA Protections
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11920-014-0494-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tasha Glenn, Scott Monteith

Abstract

Increasing quantities of medical and health data are being created outside of HIPAA protection, primarily by patients. Data sources are varied, including the use of credit cards for physician visit and medication co-pays, Internet searches, email content, social media, support groups, and mobile health apps. Most medical and health data not covered by HIPAA are controlled by third party data brokers and Internet companies. These companies combine this data with a wide range of personal information about consumer daily activities, transactions, movements, and demographics. The combined data are used for predictive profiling of individual health status, and often sold for advertising and other purposes. The rapid expansion of medical and health data outside of HIPAA protection is encroaching on privacy and the doctor-patient relationship, and is of particular concern for psychiatry. Detailed discussion of the appropriate handling of this medical and health data is needed by individuals with a wide variety of expertise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 240 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Student > Bachelor 36 15%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Researcher 16 6%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 13%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 24 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Other 49 20%
Unknown 64 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,424,446
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#162
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,272
of 246,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.