↓ Skip to main content

Association between literacy and self-rated poor health in 33 high- and upper middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between literacy and self-rated poor health in 33 high- and upper middle-income countries
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00038-017-1037-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sujay Kakarmath, Vanessa Denis, Marta Encinas-Martin, Francesca Borgonovi, S. V. Subramanian

Abstract

To assess the relationship between general literacy proficiency and self-rated poor health by analyzing data from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, an international survey conducted from 2011 to 2015 in 33 high- and upper middle-income countries and national sub-regions. Logistic regression was used to model general literacy proficiency as a predictor of self-rated poor health. Data from 167,062 adults aged 25-65 years were analyzed. The mean overall prevalence of self-rated poor health was 24%. The odds ratio of self-rated poor health for those in the lowest level of general literacy proficiency compared to those in the highest level was 2.5 (95% CI 2.2-3.0) in the unadjusted model, and 1.9 (95% CI 1.6-2.2) in the adjusted model. This association was robust over time and across countries. General literacy proficiency attenuated 22% of the effect of self-education on self-rated poor health, in addition to a substantial independent effect of its own. Our study provides robust and generalizable evidence that general literacy proficiency is independently associated with self-rated poor health. These results offer a potential modifiable target for policy interventions to reduce educational inequities in health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,789,904
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#559
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,358
of 330,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.