↓ Skip to main content

The Impacts of Health Insurance Coverage on Access to Healthcare in Children Entering Kindergarten

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Impacts of Health Insurance Coverage on Access to Healthcare in Children Entering Kindergarten
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10995-013-1420-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Haboush-Deloye, Spencer Hensley, Masaru Teramoto, Tara Phebus, Denise Tanata-Ashby

Abstract

To examine access to healthcare and health outcomes for kindergartners as they relate to insurance status and type. For the 2008, 2009, and 2010 school years, surveys were distributed to parents with a child entering kindergarten in the state of Nevada. Surveys asked parents to provide information about their child concerning their insurance status, routine medical care, medical conditions, and health behaviors. Compared to their insured peers, uninsured kindergartners were less likely to have had a check-up in the previous 12 months (p < .001; OR 6.14; 95 % CI 5.77-6.53), have a primary physician (p < .001; OR 14.32; 95 % CI 13.49-15.20), or have seen a dentist (p < .001; OR 3.93; 95 % CI 3.70-4.16), and were more likely to have a reported unmet medical need (p < .001; OR 2.60; 95 % CI 2.19-3.07). Additionally, compared to children with private insurance, those children with public insurance were less likely to have had a check-up (p < .001; OR 1.73; 95 % CI 1.59-1.89), have a primary care provider (p < .001; OR 3.87; 95 % CI 3.55-4.21), and were more likely to have unmet medical needs (p < .001; OR 2.27; 95 % CI 1.83-2.81). For children in early development-a deeply critical period-insurance status and type are predictors of important access to healthcare variables.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Psychology 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#21,415,544
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#1,874
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,767
of 313,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#34
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.