↓ Skip to main content

Distributed and Overlapping Neural Substrates for Object Individuation and Identification in Visual Short-Term Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebral Cortex, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distributed and Overlapping Neural Substrates for Object Individuation and Identification in Visual Short-Term Memory
Published in
Cerebral Cortex, September 2014
DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhu212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire K. Naughtin, Jason B. Mattingley, Paul E. Dux

Abstract

Object individuation and identification are 2 key processes involved in representing visual information in short-term memory (VSTM). Individuation involves the use of spatial and temporal cues to register an object as a distinct perceptual event relative to other stimuli, whereas object identification involves extraction of featural and related conceptual properties of a stimulus. Together, individuation and identification provide the "what," "where," and "when" of visual perception. In the current study, we asked whether individuation and identification processes are underpinned by distinct neural substrates, and to what extent brain regions that reflect these 2 operations are consistent across encoding, maintenance, and retrieval stages of VSTM. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify brain regions that represent the number of objects (individuation) and/or object features (identification) in an array. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we found substantial overlap between these 2 operations in the brain. Moreover, we show that regions supporting individuation and identification vary across distinct stages of information processing. Our findings challenge influential models of multiple-object encoding in VSTM, which argue that individuation and identification are underpinned by a limited set of nonoverlapping brain regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 47%
Neuroscience 12 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Philosophy 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,378,085
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Cerebral Cortex
#4,023
of 4,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,583
of 243,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebral Cortex
#72
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.