↓ Skip to main content

Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency Hate Their Medication: Concerns and Stronger Beliefs About the Necessity of Hydrocortisone Intake Are Associated With More Negative Illness Perceptions

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency Hate Their Medication: Concerns and Stronger Beliefs About the Necessity of Hydrocortisone Intake Are Associated With More Negative Illness Perceptions
Published in
JCEM, September 2014
DOI 10.1210/jc.2014-1527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jitske Tiemensma, Cornelie D. Andela, Alberto M. Pereira, Johannes A. Romijn, Nienke R. Biermasz, Adrian A. Kaptein

Abstract

Context: Patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) require daily and life-long hydrocortisone substitution with risks of under- and overreplacement, the necessity to adjust the dose in stressful situations, and a lack of clinical and biochemical parameters to assess optimal dosing. The spectrum of medication beliefs in patients with AI is currently unknown. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the possible association between illness perceptions and medication beliefs about hydrocortisone (HC) in patients with AI. Design and Subjects: This was a cross-sectional evaluation of illness perceptions and medication beliefs in 107 patients with primary AI (n = 49), secondary AI after the treatment of Cushing's syndrome (n = 29), or treatment of nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (n = 29). The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire were used for the assessment. Results: Stronger beliefs about the necessity of HC and stronger concerns about the adverse effects of HC were associated with attribution of more symptoms to AI, to the perception of AI being more cyclical, to the perception of more negative consequences of AI, and to the presence of stronger emotional representations (all P< .05). Furthermore, stronger beliefs about the necessity of HC intake were associated with feelings of less personal control over AI (P< .05). Stronger concerns about the adverse effects of HC were associated with lower perceived treatment control and lower illness coherence (both P< .05). In addition, patients with Cushing's syndrome reported stronger beliefs regarding the necessity of taking HC, compared with patients with Addison's disease (P= .039) or nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (P< .001). Conclusion: Specific beliefs about the necessity of hydrocortisone replacement and concerns about its adverse effects were strongly associated with more negative illness perceptions. These specific beliefs differed, depending on the etiology of AI. These results need to be taken into account in the treatment of patients with AI and may serve to enable the development of psychosocial education/self-management programs aiming at improving quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Psychology 11 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2014.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#14,556
of 15,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,440
of 246,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#61
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.