↓ Skip to main content

Acute effects of foam rolling on passive tissue stiffness and fascial sliding: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute effects of foam rolling on passive tissue stiffness and fascial sliding: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1866-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frieder Krause, Jan Wilke, Daniel Niederer, Lutz Vogt, Winfried Banzer

Abstract

Self-myofascial release (SMR) aims to mimic the effects of manual therapy and tackle dysfunctions of the skeletal muscle and connective tissue. It has been shown to induce improvements in flexibility, but the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. In addition to neuronal mechanisms, improved flexibility may be driven by acute morphological adaptations, such as a reduction in passive tissue stiffness or improved movement between fascial layers. The aim of the intended study is to evaluate the acute effects of SMR on the passive tissue stiffness of the anterior thigh muscles and the sliding properties of the associated fasciae. In a crossover study design, 16 participants will receive all of the following interventions in a permutated random order: (1) one session of 2 × 60 s of SMR at the anterior thigh, (2) one session of 2 × 60 s of passive static stretching of the anterior thigh and (3) no intervention. Passive tissue stiffness, connective tissue sliding, angle of first stretch sensation, as well as maximal active and passive knee flexion angle, will be evaluated before and directly after each intervention. The results of the intended study will allow a better understanding of, and provide further evidence on, the local effects of SMR techniques and the underlying mechanisms for flexibility improvements. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02919527 . Registered on 27 September 2016.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 286 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 20%
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 93 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 70 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 100 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,757
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,629
of 324,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.