You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circadian disrupting exposures and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00420-014-0986-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chunla He, Sonia Taj Anand, Mark H. Ebell, John E. Vena, Sara Wagner Robb |
| Abstract |
Shift work, short sleep duration, employment as a flight attendant, and exposure to light at night, all potential causes of circadian disruption, have been inconsistently associated with breast cancer (BrCA) risk. The aim of this meta-analysis is to quantitatively evaluate the combined and independent effects of exposure to different sources of circadian disruption on BrCA risk in women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 50% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#600,673
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#17
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,321
of 257,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.