↓ Skip to main content

Anxiety and ASD: Current Progress and Ongoing Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anxiety and ASD: Current Progress and Ongoing Challenges
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3322-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikle South, Jacqui Rodgers, Amy Van Hecke

Abstract

Symptoms of anxiety add significant burden to many autistic individuals and their loved ones. There is an urgent need for better understanding of the unique underlying mechanisms of anxiety in ASD, and for the development of more specific assessment methods and treatment recommendations. This special issue brings together 24 articles grouped into three themes; mechanisms, measurement, and intervention. The result is a review of current anxiety research in ASD that is both broad and deep. Key themes include recognition of the importance individual differences in aetiology and presentation of anxiety in ASD, the need for a more nuanced understanding of the interactions between anxiety and characteristics of ASD and the need to develop appropriately adapted treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 35 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,356,433
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#505
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,144
of 334,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#15
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.