↓ Skip to main content

A perfect match: noninvasive brain stimulation and psychotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A perfect match: noninvasive brain stimulation and psychotherapy
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00406-014-0540-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malek Bajbouj, Frank Padberg

Abstract

One out of four patients with a psychiatric disorder does not tolerate or sufficiently respond to standard treatments, leading to impaired quality of life, significant morbidity and mortality, as well as high socioeconomic costs. There is increasing evidence that-apart from psychopharmacologic and psychotherapeutic interventions-targeted modulation of neural networks by brain stimulation techniques might serve as a third treatment modality. In the whole spectrum of treatment modalities, combined approaches are often used for difficult-to-treat patients. They may be superior strategies compared to monotherapy and could possible also include brain stimulation interventions. However, systematic research is lacking for the latter issue. Particularly, noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), e.g., transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can be easily combined with psychotherapy approaches. Here, we introduce NIBS techniques for priming and augmenting psychotherapy, review preliminary data and propose a future research strategy. Interestingly, this strategy parallels the promising development in neurology and neurorehabilitation where tDCS is currently combined with functional training tasks to enhance motor or cognitive performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 110 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Neuroscience 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,889,699
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#756
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,213
of 253,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.