You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The extent and intensity of the 1998 mass bleaching event on the reefs of Mauritius, Indian Ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Coral Reef Society, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.3755/jcrs.2002.43 |
| Authors |
Ruby Moothien Pillay, Hiroaki Terashima, Hiroyuki Kawasaki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,568,328
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Coral Reef Society
#2
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,034
of 132,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Coral Reef Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them