You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recent developments in therapeutic protein expression technologies in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology Techniques, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10529-014-1699-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shah Fahad, Faheem Ahmed Khan, Nuruliarizki Shinta Pandupuspitasari, Muhammad Mahmood Ahmed, Yu Cai Liao, Muhammad Tahir Waheed, Muhammad Sameeullah, Darkhshan, Saddam Hussain, Shah Saud, Shah Hassan, Amanullah Jan, Mohammad Tariq Jan, Chao Wu, Ma Xiao Chun, Jianliang Huang |
| Abstract |
Infectious diseases and cancers are some of the commonest causes of deaths throughout the world. The previous two decades have witnessed a combined endeavor across various biological sciences to address this issue in novel ways. The advent of recombinant DNA technologies has provided the tools for producing recombinant proteins that can be used as therapeutic agents. A number of expression systems have been developed for the production of pharmaceutical products. Recently, advances have been made using plants as bioreactors to produce therapeutic proteins directed against infectious diseases and cancers. This review highlights the recent progress in therapeutic protein expression in plants (stable and transient), the factors affecting heterologous protein expression, vector systems and recent developments in existing technologies and steps towards the industrial production of plant-made vaccines, antibodies, and biopharmaceuticals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 22% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,804,609
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#773
of 2,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,514
of 272,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,766 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.