↓ Skip to main content

Control of HIV infection by IFN-α: implications for latency and a cure

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Control of HIV infection by IFN-α: implications for latency and a cure
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00018-017-2652-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nollaig M. Bourke, Silvia Napoletano, Ciaran Bannan, Suaad Ahmed, Colm Bergin, Áine McKnight, Nigel J. Stevenson

Abstract

Viral infections, including HIV, trigger the production of type I interferons (IFNs), which in turn, activate a signalling cascade that ultimately culminates with the expression of anti-viral proteins. Mounting evidence suggests that type I IFNs, in particular IFN-α, play a pivotal role in limiting acute HIV infection. Highly active anti-retroviral treatment reduces viral load and increases life expectancy in HIV positive patients; however, it fails to fully eliminate latent HIV reservoirs. To revisit HIV as a curable disease, this article reviews a body of literature that highlights type I IFNs as mediators in the control of HIV infection, with particular focus on the anti-HIV restriction factors induced and/or activated by IFN-α. In addition, we discuss the relevance of type I IFN treatment in the context of HIV latency reversal, novel therapeutic intervention strategies and the potential for full HIV clearance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,453,380
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,355
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,432
of 325,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#25
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.