You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a classification of biomarkers of neuropsychiatric disease: from encompass to compass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Psychiatry, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/mp.2014.139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J Davis, M Maes, A Andreazza, J J McGrath, S J Tye, M Berk |
| Abstract |
There is currently considerable imprecision in the nosology of biomarkers used in the study of neuropsychiatric disease. The neuropsychiatric field lags behind others such as oncology, wherein, rather than using 'biomarker' as a blanket term for a diverse range of clinical phenomena, biomarkers have been actively classified into separate categories, including prognostic and predictive tests. A similar taxonomy is proposed for neuropsychiatric diseases in which the core biology remains relatively unknown. This paper divides potential biomarkers into those of (1) risk, (2) diagnosis/trait, (3) state or acuity, (4) stage, (5) treatment response and (6) prognosis, and provides illustrative exemplars. Of course, biomarkers rely on available technology and, as we learn more about the neurobiological correlates of neuropsychiatric disorders, we will realize that the classification of biomarkers across these six categories can change, and some markers may fit into more than one category.Molecular Psychiatry advance online publication, 28 October 2014; doi:10.1038/mp.2014.139. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 29% |
| Norway | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 18% |
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,506,267
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#1,792
of 4,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,269
of 274,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#36
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.