↓ Skip to main content

Fish swimming in schools save energy regardless of their spatial position

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fish swimming in schools save energy regardless of their spatial position
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00265-014-1834-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Marras, Shaun S. Killen, Jan Lindström, David J. McKenzie, John F. Steffensen, Paolo Domenici

Abstract

For animals, being a member of a group provides various advantages, such as reduced vulnerability to predators, increased foraging opportunities and reduced energetic costs of locomotion. In moving groups such as fish schools, there are benefits of group membership for trailing individuals, who can reduce the cost of movement by exploiting the flow patterns generated by the individuals swimming ahead of them. However, whether positions relative to the closest neighbours (e.g. ahead, sided by side or behind) modulate the individual energetic cost of swimming is still unknown. Here, we addressed these questions in grey mullet Liza aurata by measuring tail-beat frequency and amplitude of 15 focal fish, swimming in separate schools, while swimming in isolation and in various positions relative to their closest neighbours, at three speeds. Our results demonstrate that, in a fish school, individuals in any position have reduced costs of swimming, compared to when they swim at the same speed but alone. Although fish swimming behind their neighbours save the most energy, even fish swimming ahead of their nearest neighbour were able to gain a net energetic benefit over swimming in isolation, including those swimming at the front of a school. Interestingly, this energetic saving was greatest at the lowest swimming speed measured in our study. Because any member of a school gains an energetic benefit compared to swimming alone, we suggest that the benefits of membership in moving groups may be more strongly linked to reducing the costs of locomotion than previously appreciated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 236 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 19%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 38%
Engineering 33 14%
Environmental Science 23 9%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,717,548
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#302
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,434
of 262,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#11
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.