You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ペインビジョンTMによる疼痛治療の評価
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.11321/jjspc.07-0020 |
Authors |
長谷川 丈, 杉山 大介, 熊坂 美紀子, 菱沼 美和子, 松尾 公美子, 井出 壮一郎, 田中 聡, 鬼頭 剛 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,879,916
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#19
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,326
of 89,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them