↓ Skip to main content

Terrestrial subsidies to lake food webs: an experimental approach

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Terrestrial subsidies to lake food webs: an experimental approach
Published in
Oecologia, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2141-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pia Bartels, Julien Cucherousset, Cristian Gudasz, Mats Jansson, Jan Karlsson, Lennart Persson, Katrin Premke, Anja Rubach, Kristin Steger, Lars J. Tranvik, Peter Eklöv

Abstract

Cross-ecosystem movements of material and energy are ubiquitous. Aquatic ecosystems typically receive material that also includes organic matter from the surrounding catchment. Terrestrial-derived (allochthonous) organic matter can enter aquatic ecosystems in dissolved or particulate form. Several studies have highlighted the importance of dissolved organic carbon to aquatic consumers, but less is known about allochthonous particulate organic carbon (POC). Similarly, most studies showing the effects of allochthonous organic carbon (OC) on aquatic consumers have investigated pelagic habitats; the effects of allochthonous OC on benthic communities are less well studied. Allochthonous inputs might further decrease primary production through light reduction, thereby potentially affecting autotrophic resource availability to consumers. Here, an enclosure experiment was carried out to test the importance of POC input and light availability on the resource use in a benthic food web of a clear-water lake. Corn starch (a C(4) plant) was used as a POC source due to its insoluble nature and its distinct carbon stable isotope value (δ(13)C). The starch carbon was closely dispersed over the bottom of the enclosures to study the fate of a POC source exclusively available to sediment biota. The addition of starch carbon resulted in a clear shift in the isotopic signature of surface-dwelling herbivorous and predatory invertebrates. Although the starch carbon was added solely to the sediment surface, the carbon originating from the starch reached zooplankton. We suggest that allochthonous POC can subsidize benthic food webs directly and can be further transferred to pelagic systems, thereby highlighting the importance of benthic pathways for pelagic habitats.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Canada 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 127 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 25%
Researcher 35 25%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 40%
Environmental Science 43 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 27 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,691,744
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#966
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,889
of 133,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.