↓ Skip to main content

コンピュータによる小論文の自動採点システムJessの試作

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Computational Statistics of Japan, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
コンピュータによる小論文の自動採点システムJessの試作
Published in
Bulletin of the Computational Statistics of Japan, May 2017
DOI 10.20551/jscswabun.16.1_3
Authors

石岡 恒憲, 亀田 雅之

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2017.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Computational Statistics of Japan
#15
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,001
of 325,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Computational Statistics of Japan
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.