↓ Skip to main content

When Survey Goes East: Field Survey Methodologies and Analytical Frameworks in a Central Asian Context

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Survey Goes East: Field Survey Methodologies and Analytical Frameworks in a Central Asian Context
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10816-013-9172-9
Authors

Steven Markofsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 10%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 26 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 7 23%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 45%
Arts and Humanities 11 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#265
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,032
of 202,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them