↓ Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intralesional Verapamil Versus Normal Saline Injection in a Novel Peyronie Disease Animal Model: Assessment of Immunohistopathological Changes and Erectile…

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intralesional Verapamil Versus Normal Saline Injection in a Novel Peyronie Disease Animal Model: Assessment of Immunohistopathological Changes and Erectile Function Outcome
Published in
The Journal of Urology, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Chung, Francisco Garcia, Ling De Young, Matthew Solomon, Gerald B. Brock

Abstract

While intralesional injections improve penile curvature and decrease plaque volume, the exact mechanism of action on Peyronie disease is unknown. We evaluated penile curvature, immunohistology and erectile function outcomes after intralesional injections of verapamil and normal saline in a previously described Peyronie disease animal model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#23,100,963
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#108
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,423
of 287,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#46
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.