↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: A comprehensive analysis of candidate genes and pathways in pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A comprehensive analysis of candidate genes and pathways in pancreatic cancer
Published in
Tumor Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13277-014-2787-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Liu, Jun Li, Hali Li, Aidong Li, Biou Liu, Liou Han

Abstract

The study aimed to dissect the molecular mechanism of pancreatic cancer by a range of bioinformatics approaches. Three microarray datasets (GSE32676, GSE21654, and GSE14245) were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with logarithm of fold change (|logFC|) >0.585 and p value <0.05 were identified between pancreatic cancer samples and normal controls. Transcription factors (TFs) were selected from the DEGs based on TRASFAC database. Gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were performed for the DEGs using The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (p value <0.05), followed by construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network using Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes software. Latent pathway identification analysis was applied to analyze the DEGs-related pathways crosstalk and the pathways with high weight value were included in the pathway crosstalk network using Cytoscape. Sixty-five DEGs were screened out. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta (CEBPD), FBJ osteosarcoma oncogene B (FOSB), Stratifin (SFN), Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5), Pentraxin 3 (PTX3), and nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 3 (NR4A3) were important TFs. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) was the hub node of the PPI network. DEGs were significantly enriched in NOD-like receptor signaling pathway which was primarily interacted with inflammation and immune related pathways (cytosolic DNA-sensing, hematopoietic cell lineage, intestinal immune network for IgA production and chemokine pathways). The study suggested CEBPD, FOSB, SFN, KLF5, PTX3, NR4A3, IL-6, and NOD-like receptor pathways were involved in pancreatic cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Postgraduate 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Computer Science 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,310,749
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,050
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,902
of 362,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#53
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.