You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid Borgmeier, Joachim Westenhoefer |
| Abstract |
Front of pack food labels or signpost labels are currently widely discussed as means to help consumers to make informed food choices. It is hoped that more informed food choices will result in an overall healthier diet. There is only limited evidence, as to which format of a food label is best understood by consumers, helps them best to differentiate between more or less healthy food and whether these changes in perceived healthiness result in changes of food choice. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 509 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 126 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 12% |
| Researcher | 52 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 78 | 15% |
| Unknown | 117 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 51 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 9% |
| Other | 134 | 25% |
| Unknown | 138 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,311,444
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,504
of 17,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,743
of 124,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.