↓ Skip to main content

Protective role of gut commensal microbes against intestinal infections

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microbiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective role of gut commensal microbes against intestinal infections
Published in
Journal of Microbiology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12275-014-4655-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

My Young Yoon, Keehoon Lee, Sang Sun Yoon

Abstract

The human gastrointestinal tract is colonized by multitudes of microorganisms that exert beneficial effects on human health. Mounting evidence suggests that intestinal microbiota contributes to host resistance against enteropathogenic bacterial infection. However, molecular details that account for such an important role has just begun to be understood. The commensal microbes in the intestine regulate gut homeostasis through activating the development of host innate immunity and producing molecules with antimicrobial activities that directly inhibit propagation of pathogenic bacteria. Understanding the protective roles of gut microbiota will provide a better insight into the molecular basis that underlies complicated interaction among host-pathogen-symbiont. In this review, we highlighted recent findings that help us broaden our knowledge of the intestinal ecosystem and thereby come up with a better strategy for combating enteropathogenic infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,710,624
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiology
#170
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,849
of 369,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.