↓ Skip to main content

Accumulation of glycated proteins suggesting premature ageing in lamin B receptor deficient mice

Overview of attention for article published in Biogerontology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
15 patents

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accumulation of glycated proteins suggesting premature ageing in lamin B receptor deficient mice
Published in
Biogerontology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10522-017-9733-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Hause, Dietmar Schlote, Andreas Simm, Katrin Hoffmann, Alexander Navarrete Santos

Abstract

Accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) is accompanied by increased free radical activity which contributes to ageing and the development or worsening of degenerative diseases. Apart from other physiological factors, AGEs are also an important biomarker for premature ageing. Here we report protein modifications (glycation) in a mouse model of lamin B receptor deficient ic (J) /ic (J) mice displaying skin defects similar to those of classical progeria. Therefore, we analysed AGE-modifications in protein extracts from various tissues of ic (J) /ic (J) mice. Our results demonstrated that pentosidine as well as argpyrimidine were increased in ic (J) /ic (J) mice indicating a modification specific increase in biomarkers of ageing, especially derived from glycolysis dependent methylglyoxal. Furthermore, the expression of AGE-preventing enzymes (Glo1, Fn3k) differed between ic (J) /ic (J) and control mice. The results indicate that not only lamin A but also the lamin B receptor may be involved in ageing processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Other 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,688,171
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from Biogerontology
#186
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,206
of 329,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogerontology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.