You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000503.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward F Bell, Michael J Acarregui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Canada | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 72 | 25% |
| Unknown | 71 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 85 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,996,381
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,225
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,174
of 370,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.