You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005073.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janesh K Gupta, Anju Sinha, M A Lumsden, Martha Hickey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
Spain | 3 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 338 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 44 | 13% |
Other | 35 | 10% |
Researcher | 30 | 9% |
Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
Other | 63 | 18% |
Unknown | 114 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
Other | 29 | 9% |
Unknown | 124 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,422,917
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,030
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,450
of 360,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.