↓ Skip to main content

Edge biomarkers for classification and prediction of phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Edge biomarkers for classification and prediction of phenotypes
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11427-014-4757-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Zeng, WanWei Zhang, XiangTian Yu, XiaoPing Liu, MeiYi Li, Rui Liu, LuoNan Chen

Abstract

In general, a disease manifests not from malfunction of individual molecules but from failure of the relevant system or network, which can be considered as a set of interactions or edges among molecules. Thus, instead of individual molecules, networks or edges are stable forms to reliably characterize complex diseases. This paper reviews both traditional node biomarkers and edge biomarkers, which have been newly proposed. These biomarkers are classified in terms of their contained information. In particular, we show that edge and network biomarkers provide novel ways of stably and reliably diagnosing the disease state of a sample. First, we categorize the biomarkers based on the information used in the learning and prediction steps. We then briefly introduce conventional node biomarkers, or molecular biomarkers without network information, and their computational approaches. The main focus of this paper is edge and network biomarkers, which exploit network information to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis. Moreover, by extracting both network and dynamic information from the data, we can develop dynamical network and edge biomarkers. These biomarkers not only diagnose the immediate pre-disease state but also detect the critical molecules or networks by which the biological system progresses from the healthy to the disease state. The identified critical molecules can be used as drug targets, and the critical state indicates the critical point of disease control. The paper also discusses representative biomarker-based methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 24%
Computer Science 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,387,239
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#617
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,794
of 258,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.