↓ Skip to main content

AGEs–RAGE overexpression in a patient with smoking-related idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in CEN Case Reports, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AGEs–RAGE overexpression in a patient with smoking-related idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosis
Published in
CEN Case Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13730-017-0290-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nao Nakamura, Kensei Taguchi, Yoshihiro Miyazono, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyomi Koike, Yuka Kurokawa, Yosuke Nakayama, Yusuke Kaida, Ryo Shibata, Akihiro Tsuchimoto, Katsuhiko Asanuma, Kei Fukami

Abstract

We report a case of smoking-related idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosis (ING) with overexpression of glomerular advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their receptor (RAGE). A 59-year-old Japanese man with nephrotic syndrome, who had a smoking history of one pack of cigarettes per day for approximately 40 years, presented with a 3-year history of urinalysis abnormalities without clinical evidence of diabetic mellitus. The patient's leg edema progressively worsened over the previous 2 years, and he was admitted to our hospital. Renal biopsy showed mesangial expansion with diabetic Kimmelstiel-Wilson-like nodular lesions, glomerular basement thickening, and arteriosclerosis. No electron-dense deposits, fibrils, or microtubule deposits were seen in the glomeruli on electron microscopy. Skin AGE level measured using AGE reader was higher in this case than the average level in age-matched Caucasians. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis revealed that N-carboxymethyl lysine, one of the major AGEs, and RAGE were overexpressed and podocin expression was decreased in the peripheral area of the glomerular nodular lesions. These observations suggest that AGEs-RAGE system may be activated in smoking-related ING, possibly leading to the progression of renal dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 36%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,454,971
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from CEN Case Reports
#176
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373,330
of 438,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CEN Case Reports
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.