You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantifying water requirements of riparian river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia – implications for the management of environmental flows
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecohydrology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/eco.1598 |
Authors |
Tanya M. Doody, Matthew J. Colloff, Micah Davies, Vijay Koul, Richard G. Benyon, Pamela L. Nagler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 24 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,892,784
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Ecohydrology
#193
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,321
of 361,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecohydrology
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.