You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Macroevolutionary Processes and Biomic Specialization: Testing the Resource-use Hypothesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evolutionary Ecology, May 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10682-004-8152-7 |
Authors |
Manuel Hernández fernández, Elisabeth S. Vrba |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 4% |
Brazil | 3 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Argentina | 2 | 2% |
Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 100 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 51% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 18% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 18% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 11 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,915,466
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#94
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,430
of 58,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them