You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isotonic versus hypotonic saline solution for maintenance intravenous fluid therapy in children: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Nephrology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00467-014-3033-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
April P. Padua, Josep Ryan G. Macaraya, Leonila F. Dans, Francisco E. Anacleto |
| Abstract |
The administration of hypotonic saline solution for maintenance intravenous fluid (IVF) therapy has been the standard of care, but recent evidence has shown this treatment to be associated with hyponatremia-related complications. The aim of this systematic review was to determine which IVF, i.e., a hypotonic or an isotonic saline solution, poses less risk for the development of hyponatremia among hospitalized children who require maintenance IVF therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 19% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,876,009
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#142
of 3,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,924
of 351,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,535 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.