↓ Skip to main content

Noradrenergic Blockade of Memory Reconsolidation: A Failure to Reduce Conditioned Fear Responding

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noradrenergic Blockade of Memory Reconsolidation: A Failure to Reduce Conditioned Fear Responding
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke Geerte Nynke Bos, Tom Beckers, Merel Kindt

Abstract

Upon recall, a memory can enter a labile state in which it requires new protein synthesis to restabilize. This two-phased reconsolidation process raises the prospect to directly target excessive fear memory as opposed to the formation of inhibitory memory following extinction training. In our previous studies, we convincingly demonstrated that 40 mg propranolol HCl administration before or after memory reactivation eliminated the emotional expression of fear memory indexed by the fear potentiated startle reflex. To apply this procedure in clinical practice it is important to understand the optimal and boundary conditions of this procedure. As part of a large project aimed at unraveling putative boundary conditions of disrupting reconsolidation of associative fear memory with propranolol HCl, we again tested our memory reconsolidation procedure. Participants (N = 44) underwent a three-day differential fear conditioning procedure. Twenty-four hours after fear acquisition, participants received 40 mg propranolol HCl prior to memory reactivation. The next day, participants were subjected to extinction training and reinstatement testing. In sharp contrast to our previous findings, propranolol HCl before memory reactivation did not attenuate the startle fear response. Remarkably, the startle fear response even persisted during extinction training and did not show the usually observed gradual decline in conditioned physiological responding (startle potentiation and skin conductance) upon repeated unreinforced trials. We discuss these unexpected findings and propose some potential explanations. It remains, however, unclear why we observed a resistance to reduce conditioned fear responding by either disrupting reconsolidation or extinction training. The present results underscore that the success of human fear conditioning research may depend on subtle manipulations and instructions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
India 1 1%
China 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 91 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 25%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Professor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 41%
Neuroscience 12 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,208,760
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,890
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,095
of 361,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#41
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.