You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Renal Dysfunction Is Associated With a Reduced Contribution of Nitric Oxide and Enhanced Vasoconstriction After a Congenital Renal Mass Reduction in Sheep
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.114.013930 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yugeesh R Lankadeva, Reetu R Singh, Karen M Moritz, Helena C Parkington, Kate M Denton, Marianne Tare |
| Abstract |
Children born with reduced congenital renal mass have an increased risk of hypertension and chronic kidney disease in adulthood, although the mechanisms are poorly understood. Similar sequelae occur after fetal uninephrectomy (uni-x) in sheep, leading to a 30% nephron deficit. We hypothesized that renal dysfunction is underpinned by a reduced contribution of nitric oxide (NO) and vascular dysfunction in uni-x sheep. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 25% |
| Psychology | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#21,001,758
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#19,825
of 21,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,425
of 276,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#144
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.