↓ Skip to main content

Extending coarsened exact matching to multiple cohorts: an application to longitudinal well-being program evaluation within an employer population

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 118)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extending coarsened exact matching to multiple cohorts: an application to longitudinal well-being program evaluation within an employer population
Published in
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10742-014-0136-7
Authors

J. A. Sidney, C. Coberley, J. E. Pope, A. Wells

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Social Sciences 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,528,558
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
#36
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,064
of 357,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them