↓ Skip to main content

Australian clinical practice guidelines for BE and EAC

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Australian clinical practice guidelines for BE and EAC
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, April 2015
DOI 10.1111/jgh.12913
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C Whiteman, Mark Appleyard, Farzan F Bahin, Yuri V Bobryshev, Michael J Bourke, Ian Brown, Adrian Chung, Andrew Clouston, Emma Dickins, Jon Emery, Guy D Eslick, Louisa G Gordon, Florian Grimpen, Geoff Hebbard, Laura Holliday, Luke F Hourigan, Bradley J Kendall, Eric YT Lee, Angelique Levert‐Mignon, Reginald V Lord, Sarah J Lord, Derek Maule, Alan Moss, Ian Norton, Ian Olver, Darren Pavey, Spiro Raftopoulos, Shan Rajendra, Mark Schoeman, Rajvinder Singh, Freddy Sitas, B Mark Smithers, Andrew C Taylor, Melissa L Thomas, Iain Thomson, Henry To, Jutta von Dincklage, Christine Vuletich, David I Watson, Ian F Yusoff

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus (BE), a common condition, is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There is uncertainty about the best way to manage BE, since most people with BE never develop EAC and most patients diagnosed with EAC have no preceding diagnosis of BE. Moreover, there have been recent advances in knowledge and practice about the management of BE and early EAC. To aid clinical decision-making in this rapidly moving field, Cancer Council Australia convened an expert working party to identify pertinent clinical questions. The questions covered a wide range of topics including endoscopic and histologic definitions of BE and early EAC; prevalence, incidence, natural history and risk factors for BE; and methods for managing BE and early EAC. The latter considered modification of lifestyle factors; screening and surveillance strategies; and medical, endoscopic and surgical interventions. To answer each question, the working party systematically reviewed the literature and developed a set of recommendations through consensus. Evidence underpinning each recommendation was rated according to quality and applicability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Other 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,499,111
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#254
of 3,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,185
of 279,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.